Positivism and Interpretivism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55737/qjss.928180731Keywords:
Positivism and Interpretivism, Positivists, Social SciencesAbstract
Positivism is a research approach based on ontological principles that there is an objective reality which is free and independent of viewer and waiting to be discovered. Auguste Comte, a French philosopher from 19th century is credited for being the one who introduced the philosophy of Positivism as it stands today. Since then, positivism as a research approach has gone through different stages of evolution but Comte influence still remains dominant. Positivism tries desperately to fill the gap between natural and social sciences. Despite being an innovative and healthy concept in social research, positivism is subject to harsh criticism since its birth. There is a fundamental flaw in the assumption that positivism makes about scientific enquiry in social sciences. When positivism met criticism, Interpretivism popped up its head though it had been in use for quite a while. It is a research methods that argues that people�s knowledge or understanding of reality is a social construction. In other words, it is meant that there is no objective reality or truth in social world. The entire debate between the two schools of thought revolves around the nature of reality and how it is to be discovered. If one is subjective, the other is objective in its approach to reality.
References
Aliyu, A. A., Bello, M. U., Kasim, R., & Martin, D. (2014). Positivist and Non-Positivist Paradigm in Social Science Research: Conflicting Paradigms or Perfect Partners? Journal of Management and Sustainability, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.5539/jms.v4n3p79.
Chowdhury, M. F. (2014). Interpretivism in Aiding Our Understanding of the Contemporary Social World. Open Journal of Philosophy, 04(03), 432–438. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojpp.2014.43047
Fazlıoğulları O. (2012). Scientific Research Paradigms in Social Sciences. International Journal of Educational Policies, 6 (1), 41-55.
Goldkuhl, G. (2012). Pragmatism vs interpretivism in qualitative information systems research. European Journal of Information Systems, 21(2), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2011.54
Goodsell, T. L. (2013). The Interpretive Tradition in Social Science. National Council on Family Relations. Texas.
Gray, D. E. (2004). Doing Research in the Real World. London: SAGE.
Hasan, M. N. (2014). Positivism: to what extent does it aid our understanding of the contemporary social world? Quality & Quantity, 50(1), 317–325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-014-0150-4
Mack, L. (2010). The Philosophical Underpinnings of Educational Research. Polyglossia, 19.
Matta, C. (2015). Interpretivism and Causal Explanations: A Case from Educational Research. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 45(06), 543-567.
Nudzor, H. P. (2009). A critical commentary on combined methods approach to researching educational and social issues. Issues in Educational Research, 19(02), 114-127.
Oppong, S. (2014). A Critique of the Philosophical Underpinnings of Mainstream Social Science Research. Academicus International Scientific Journal, 10, 242–254. https://doi.org/10.7336/academicus.2014.10.17.
PhotongSunan, S. (2010). Intretivist Paradigm in Education Research. Galxy, 04.
Rescher, N. (2003). Epistemology an Introduction to the Theory of Knowledge. State University of New York Press.
Ryan, P. (2015). Positivism: paradigm or culture? Policy Studies, 36(4), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2015.1073246.
