Effect of Simulated Teaching on Prospective Teachers’ Communication Skills at Undergraduate Level

Authors

  • Sadia Jabeen PhD Scholar, Department of Education, Faculty of Social Sciences, The University of Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.
  • Dr. Mehwish Gull Assistant Professor, Department of Education, Faculty of Social Sciences, The University of Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55737/qjss.v-iv.24293

Keywords:

Simulated Teaching, Communication Skills, Prospective Teachers, Undergraduate Level

Abstract

The present study aimed to examine the effect of simulated teaching on prospective teachers' communication skills at the undergraduate level. The present study adopted the A-B-A single-subject research design. The study population consisted of all prospective teachers from the Department of Education at the University of Lahore. The study sample was comprised of eighteen students from B. Ed. (Hons) elementary semester six. The experiment consisted of sixteen weeks, during which the researcher observed prospective teachers during practice teaching. The observation checklist was developed to check the prospective teachers' communication skills in the actual classroom setting. Inferential statistics was used to analyze the data. A one-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to determine the significant effect of simulated teaching during the experiment and withdrawal phase. The findings of the present study concluded that simulated teaching had a significant effect during the treatment and withdrawal phase. Prospective teachers enhanced their communication skills through simulation during practice teaching. The study recommended enhancing prospective teachers' communication skills by employing simulating teaching techniques at the undergraduate level.

Author Biography

  • Sadia Jabeen, PhD Scholar, Department of Education, Faculty of Social Sciences, The University of Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan.

References

Ahmed, M., & Ambreen, M. (2018). Gender differentials among teachers’ classroom management strategies in Pakistani context. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 5(2), 178-198. http://dx.doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v5i2.2253

Bell, B. S., Kanar, Adam M., & Kozlowski S. W. J. (2008). Current issues and future directions in simulated-based training. CAHRS Working Paper #08-13). Cornell University, School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Center for Advanced Human Resource Studies. http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/cahrswp/492.

Caires, S., & Alemeida, L. S. (2007). Positive aspects of the teacher training supervision: The student teachers’ perspective. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22(4), 515-528. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03173469

Chen, J. C., & Martin, A. R. (2015). Role-play simulations as a transformative methodology in environmental education. Journal of Transformative Education, 13(1), 85–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344614560196

Chien, C. W. (2014). Pre-service elementary school English teachers’ learning and reflection through simulated teaching practice and oral interviews. Reflective Practice, 15(6), 821-835. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2014.944139

Ferber, T., & Nillas, L. (2010). Through the eyes of student teachers: successes and challenges in field teaching experiences. National Teacher Education Journal, 3(2), 61-86.

Ghavifekr, S., & Rosdy, W. A. W. (2015). Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in schools. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 1(2), 175-191. http://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.23596

Heim, E. (2012). Simulation-based learning in education and further education. Central European Business Review, 1(2), 59–59. https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.23

Katitia, D. M. O. (2015). Teacher education preparation program for the 21st century: Which way forward for Kenya? Journal of Education and Practice, 6(24), 56-67. http://kerd.ku.ac.ke/123456789/541

Khan, A., Khan, S., Zia-Ul-Islam, & Khan, M. (2017). Communication skills of a teacher and its role in the development of the students’ academic success. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(1), 18-21. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1131770.pdf

Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 309-326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2

Maheshwari, G. (2022). Influence of teacher-perceived transformational and transactional school leadership on teachers’ job satisfaction and performance: a case of Vietnam. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 21(4), 876-890. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2020.1866020

Mukhtar, M. A., Hasim, Z., & Md Yunus, M. (2018). The efficacy of simulated teaching in preparing pre-service teachers for practicum. Journal of Nusantara Studies, 3(1), 64. https://doi.org/10.24200/jonus.vol3iss1pp64-74

Presnilla-Espada, J. (2014). An exploratory study on simulated teaching as experienced by education students. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 2(1), 51-63. http://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2014.020106

Salas, E., Wildman, J. L., & Piccolo, R. F. (2009). Using simulation-based training to enhance management education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(4), 559-573. http://doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2009.47785474

Sharma, G. (2017). Simulated teaching: A pragmatic approach in teaching of home science. IJRHAL, 5(6), 163-168. http://www.impactjournals.us/archives/2-11-1498721645-19.pdf

Downloads

Published

2025-02-19

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Jabeen, S., & Gull, M. (2025). Effect of Simulated Teaching on Prospective Teachers’ Communication Skills at Undergraduate Level. Qlantic Journal of Social Sciences , 5(4), 461-468. https://doi.org/10.55737/qjss.v-iv.24293