The Dilemma of Non-compliance between Institutions and How it Effects Government Servants with special reference to Executive-Judiciary Relations in Pakistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55737/qjss.v-iv.24302Keywords:
Judiciary, Government Servants, Pakistan, Democratic Polity, Education DepartmentAbstract
The judiciary and executive are two of the fundamental institutions in any democratic polity and coordination and cooperation between them are fundamental for the smooth running of the affairs of the government. However, if there is any incoherence and lack of cooperation between them, it is the public and its servants that suffer the most in the process. This research article talks about one such phenomenon in the Pakistani context by getting involved in an academic and theoretical debate. To understand this phenomenon, different theories and their comparative strengths and weaknesses have been discussed in detail. In the course of this research article, off-and-on recourse has been made to Muhammad Arif's case in the Elementary and Secondary Education Department in the KP province to better understand the phenomena with empirical evidence.
References
Ayeni, M. A., & Adeleye, J. O. (2013). Education and political restructure in Nigeria. Journal of Education and Learning, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v2n1p171
Benedetto, M. D. (2018). Effective Law from a Regulatory and Administrative Law Perspective. In European Journal of Risk Regulation (Vol. 9, Issue 3, p. 391). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2018.52
Foorthuis, R. (2020). Tactics for Internal Compliance: A Literature Review [Review of Tactics for Internal Compliance: A Literature Review]. arXiv (Cornell University). Cornell University. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2008.03775
Helmke, G., & Levitsky, S. (2004). Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research agenda. Perspectives on Politics, 2(04), 725–740. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592704040472
Hinings, (2018). “This Crooked System” Police Abuse and Reform in Pakistan. [Data set]. In Human Rights Documents online. https://doi.org/10.1163/2210-7975_hrd-2156-2016048
Kapiszewski, D. & Taylor, M. M. (2012). Compliance: Conceptualizing, Measuring, and Explaining Adherence to Judicial Rulings. In Law & Social Inquiry (Vol. 38, Issue 4, p. 803). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2012.01320.x
Khan, T. A., & Christensen, T. (2020). Challenges of Implementing a Performance and Reward System in Higher Education Institutions in Pakistan: Perceptions of Top Leaders in Contending Regulatory Bodies. In Public Organization Review (Vol. 21, Issue 2, p. 243). Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-020-00486-1
Mullally, S. (2009). Intersectionality and Beyond: Law, Power and the Politics of Location, London: Routledge. SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1557355
Munir, B., & Noreen, U. (2020). Balancing and Rebalancing of Judicial Autonomy: a Critical Analysis of Basic Structure Theory. In Global Social Sciences Review (p. 152). https://doi.org/10.31703/gssr.2020(v-iv).16
Rizvi, A. (2016). Reasons for the Institutional Failure in Pakistan. In SSRN Electronic Journal. RELX Group (Netherlands). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2736199
Siddiquee, N. A., & Zafarullah, H. (2020). Absolute Power, Absolute Venality: The Politics of Corruption and Anti-corruption in Malaysia. In Public Integrity (Vol. 24, Issue 1, p. 1). Taylor & Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2020.1830541
Varella, M. D. (2014). Internationalization of Law: Globalization, International Law and Complexity. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BB16239071
Zulfiqar, K., Nawaz, A. R., Qayyum, M., & Asghar, F. (2022). Pakistan's development dilemma: An empirical analysis of Aid, Governance, and human development. THE LAHORE JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 65-90. https://doi.org/10.35536/lje.2022.v27.i2.a4
